Pictures Hiding Secrets, Working in a Different Hue, A Change of Plan, The Restart: Less Patience Required, Convenience vs Security, and An Unexpected Reveal. It's CISO Intelligence for Monday, 10th November 2025.

Table of Contents

1. LANDFALL: A Ruckus in Android Spy-Fi
2. Attack of the Purple Team: When Red and Blue Make Cybersecurity Magic
3. Drilling Down on Uncle Sam’s Proposed TP-Link Ban
4. Try Turning It Off and On Again—Faster!
5. Avoiding the Collaboration App Slap
6. The Great Firewall’s Slip: Knownsec’s Classified Leak

LANDFALL: A Ruckus in Android Spy-Fi

When spy games meet pixels—a story Samsung won't soon forget.

What You Need to Know

Unit 42 researchers have uncovered a sophisticated commercial-grade spyware, dubbed "LANDFALL," exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in Samsung’s Android image processing library (CVE-2025-21042). Primarily targeting Samsung Galaxy devices, this vulnerability was actively attacked in the wild until patched in April 2025. As a board, you are tasked with understanding the implications of this zero-day exploit and ensuring that Samsung device users within your organization apply the latest security updates immediately. Moreover, there must be a reevaluation of third-party libraries and their patch management processes.

CISO focus: Mobile Device Security, Threat Intelligence, Vulnerability Management
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

In the realm of cybersecurity, surprises are less indulgences than nightmares—and LANDFALL, the latest Android spyware, is no exception. Discovered by Unit 42 researchers from Palo Alto Networks, this malicious software exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-21042) in Samsung's image processing library. Before being patched, it wreaked havoc by turning Samsung Galaxy devices into personal surveillance tools.

A New Spyware Star: LANDFALL

LANDFALL represents a new generation of commercial-grade spyware. It was specifically tailored for Samsung Galaxy devices, a testament to the sophistication and audacity of its creators. The spyware facilitated wide-ranging surveillance capabilities - from eavesdropping using device microphones to stealthily extracting location data, photos, and call logs.

How It Came to Be

LANDFALL capitalized on a Samsung Android library vulnerability related to DNG image files. The exploit chain possibly leveraged zero-click delivery mechanisms, sparking eerie similarities to recent iOS exploit chains. Intriguingly, the campaign bore trademarks associated with several infamous commercial spyware operations prevalent in the Middle East, hinting at the participation of Private Sector Offensive Actors (PSOAs).

Scrutinizing the Attack

While Samsung patched the vulnerability in April 2025, the fact that LANDFALL remained undetected for months reveals weaknesses in existing security systems. The exploit's use of maliciously crafted image files echoes a broader pattern of vulnerabilities across mobile platforms, and it serves as a stark warning about the omission of regular vulnerability assessments.

Key Findings

• Target Audience: Samsung Galaxy device users in the Middle East were the primary targets.
• Delivery Method: Crafted through malformed DNG image files.
• Linkages: Shared infrastructure and tactics align with established commercial spyware operations.
• Duration: Operated undetected over several months before patch release.

The Bigger Picture

This incident is a valuable case study in the vulnerability exploit chains that nucleate silently. The delayed identification and remediation underscore the criticality of proactive cybersecurity measures and vigilant patch management. Moreover, LANDFALL raises urgent questions about the safety and security of third-party libraries that power our connected devices.

Conclusion - Pixels to Plagues

The LANDFALL saga serves as a chilling reminder of the evolving complexity and ambition of cyber threats. Despite its focus on Samsung devices, this episode transcends brand boundaries and hearts a more universal lesson on the need for robust, proactive cybersecurity measures. As the battleground shifts to smartphones, it's essential to recognize the magnitude of what can happen when pixels turn into plagues.

Vendor Diligence

As you consider safeguards against such sophisticated threats, posing the right questions to your vendors can be crucial:
**

1. How frequently are your third-party libraries audited for vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-21042?
2. What mechanisms do you have in place for rapid incident detection, analysis, and response?
3. Can you ensure immediate and seamless patch deployment across all affected devices and systems?**

Action Plan

For the Response Teams Reporting to the CISO:

1. Security Patch Deployment: Immediate deployment of the latest security patches across all Samsung devices within the organization.
2. Threat Intelligence Sharing: Share findings related to LANDFALL across all levels of the organization and with relevant industry partners.
3. Vulnerability Audit: Conduct a comprehensive audit of all third-party libraries and ensure regular updates.
4. Training and Awareness: Reinforce training programs focusing on emerging threats and best practices in device security.

Source: Unit 42, Palo Alto Networks

Attack of the Purple Team: When Red and Blue Make Cybersecurity Magic

We've gone purple, and it's fabulous.

What You Need to Know

In the constantly evolving world of cybersecurity, the integration of red and blue teams into a unified purple team is no longer just an innovative approach—it's essential. This strategy not only enhances an organization's cyber defenses but also ensures a more comprehensive understanding of potential vulnerabilities. As board members, you are expected to support the adoption of this collaborative approach in your organization to strengthen security postures and responses.

CISO Focus: Purple Teaming and Collaboration Enhancement
Sentiment: Positive
Time to Impact: Short (3-18 months)

In the kaleidoscope world of cybersecurity, we often hear of red and blue teams battling it out to either attack or defend. However, a new color is emerging on the horizon—purple. The concept of purple teaming combines the offensive red teaming with the defensive blue team efforts, creating a more synchronized and effective approach to cybersecurity.

The Spectrum Shift: From Rivalry to Collaboration

Traditional cybersecurity models pit red teams, focusing on offensive threats, against blue teams, tasked with defense. While this dynamic can drive innovation, it also creates silos and limits communication. Enter purple teaming—an innovation that advocates direct collaboration between the teams, ensuring vulnerabilities are detected and fixed faster. When these teams work together, they facilitate a feedback loop essential for proactive threat mitigation.

Benefits of Purple Teaming:

• Enhanced Communication: Red and blue teams sharing insights, fostering an organizational culture of openness in addressing and preventing threats.
• Real-time Response: Faster identification and remediation of vulnerabilities, minimizing potential damages.
• Comprehensive Insights: A deeper understanding of threats from both an offensive and defensive standpoint, paving the way for a fortified security posture.

Real-world Impact: Turning Theory into Practice

The shift to a purple teaming model isn't just theoretical. Organizations that have embraced this tactic report significant improvements in their security postures. By conducting continuous testing and assessment, companies are better equipped to handle threats, leading to enhanced trust and reduced risk of breaches.

• Case Studies: Companies that implemented purple teaming noted a reduction in incident response time by up to 50%.
• Tools and Techniques: Utilization of advanced tools like automated testing environments to facilitate smooth collaboration and improve efficiency.

Challenges in the Purple Team Transformation

Transitioning to purple teaming isn't without its challenges. Organizations might face hurdles such as:

• Cultural Resistance: Overcoming traditional team structures and mindsets can be difficult.
• Resource Allocation: Ensuring both teams have the resources they need to collaborate effectively.
• Continuous Training: Keeping up with the evolving threat landscape requires ongoing education and adjustment of strategies.

Despite these challenges, the benefits far outweigh the difficulties. Organizations that successfully navigate these transitions stand to gain a significant competitive advantage in the cybersecurity landscape.

Stay Lavender: The Art of Sustained Innovation

Breaking down barriers between red and blue teams is only the beginning. To maintain an edge, organizations must continually evaluate and refine their purple teaming strategies.

• Feedback Loops: Establish continuous feedback to learn and adapt from both successful defenses and breaches.
• Technology Integration: Leverage AI and machine learning to support real-time analysis and decision-making.
• A Culture of Innovation: Encourage creativity within teams to explore and develop novel solutions to threats.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. What role do your products/services play in facilitating purple team collaborations?
2. How do your solutions support continuous improvement in threat detection and defense?
3. Can your tools integrate seamlessly with existing offensive and defensive capabilities?

Action Plan

1. Assessment: Evaluate current red and blue team structures and identify integration opportunities.
2. Training: Initiate specialized training programs to foster cross-team skills and understanding.
3. Implementation: Develop a roadmap for incorporating purple teaming into your cybersecurity strategy, setting measurable goals.
4. Feedback Mechanism: Establish a structured feedback loop for continuous improvement based on real-world performance.
5. Resource Allocation: Ensure both teams are equipped with the tools and resources needed to work collaboratively.

Source: Continuous Purple Teaming: Turning Red-Blue Rivalry into Real Defense

Drilling Down on Uncle Sam’s Proposed TP-Link Ban

When Uncle Sam decides to take down a router, you know things are about to get serious.

What You Need to Know

The United States government has proposed a ban on TP-Link, due to potential national security risks associated with its networking equipment. Executive teams should assess their current use of TP-Link and strategize potential transitions to alternative providers if the ban goes through. It is crucial for management to understand the implications on network security and compliance, ensuring continued smooth operations while safeguarding against potential threats.

CISO Focus: Network Security and Compliance
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Short (3-18 months)

In a move that underscores the increasing intersections of technology and national security, the United States is proposing a ban on TP-Link, a company renowned for its affordable and widely-used networking equipment. The potential ban, which could radically reshape IT infrastructures across various sectors, is a response to growing concerns over data security and espionage.

The Core of the Issue

The apprehension surrounding TP-Link stems from the company's ties to China and the potential for its devices to be leveraged in cyber-espionage operations. With a reputation for producing budget-friendly routers and extenders, TP-Link holds a significant market share, making the implications of a ban particularly profound. The U.S. government's firm stance signals a proactive measure to preempt any security risks that may jeopardize national security.

Implications for Businesses

A ban on TP-Link would compel businesses to revamp their network strategies, especially those heavily reliant on TP-Link for low-cost network solutions. Here are the key impacts:

• Immediate Upheaval in Supply Chains: Companies using TP-Link products will need to quickly identify and source alternative solutions, thereby increasing operational costs and complexity.
• Increased Focus on Compliance: Organizations must evaluate their current inventories and transition strategies to maintain compliance with new regulatory standards.
• Potential Disruptions in Connectivity: Transitioning to alternative network solutions could result in temporary disruptions, thereby affecting business continuity.

Broader Security Concerns

At the heart of this issue is a broader security narrative: protecting sensitive data from foreign adversaries. The U.S. Government’s scrutiny of TP-Link reflects an escalating effort to mitigate risk vectors in the nation's digital ecosystem.

• Data Privacy: Consumer and business data handled through TP-Link devices are at potential risk of exposure to foreign entities.
• Network Vulnerabilities: Cheap, mass-produced devices come with vulnerabilities that can be exploited, creating backdoors into corporate and national networks.

CISO Playbook: Preparing for the Shift

As the landscape changes, the CISO and their team must be prepared to guide their organizations through this potential transition:

Steps to Take

• Audit Current Equipment: Begin with an inventory of all TP-Link devices currently being used within the organization.
• Risk Assessment: Evaluate the vulnerabilities and the importance of data handled through TP-Link devices.
• Vendor Engagement: Engage with alternative vendors now to secure products and negotiated contracts ahead of an anticipated rush.
• Employee Training: Train staff to implement and manage new devices and security protocols.

Off the Router: Smooth Streaming or Buffering Woes?

Transitioning from TP-Link may seem daunting but aligning with trusted vendors will pave the way for enhanced security and uninterrupted connectivity.

As enterprises prepare for possible legislative changes, it’s imperative to focus on robust network security policies and vendor partnerships. A system built on vigilance and adaptability will stand firm against emerging technological threats.

Vendor Diligence

As organizations look beyond TP-Link, here are three crucial questions to ask potential new vendors:

1. What is your commitment to data privacy and security, particularly in the context of foreign influence?
2. Can you provide detailed documentation regarding the security and vulnerability management processes of your products?
3. How do you ensure compliance with U.S. cybersecurity standards and regulations?

Action Plan

1. Immediate Audit: Conduct an organization-wide inventory to identify the extent of TP-Link utilization.
2. Incident Readiness: Prepare incident response teams for any emerging vulnerabilities or device failures during the transition.
3. Procurement Strategy: Begin discussions with alternative network solutions providers to secure reliable replacements expeditiously.
4. Policy Update: Update internal policies to reflect changing compliance and security standards.
5. Employee Training: Implement a training program focusing on the new systems and security awareness.

Source: Drilling Down on Uncle Sam’s Proposed TP-Link Ban

Try Turning It Off and On Again—Faster!

"Because when your machine fails, who has the time to wait?"

What You Need to Know

Microsoft is piloting a feature called "Quick Machine Recovery" in Windows 11, poised to revolutionize system recovery speeds for users, potentially alleviating one of the most frustrating aspects of computer failure. The board and executive management ought to watch this innovation, recognizing its potential impact on reducing downtime and improving operational efficiency. Your primary tasks are to evaluate its integration into current systems and anticipate any cybersecurity ramifications.

CISO focus: System Resilience and Business Continuity
Sentiment: Positive
Time to Impact: Short (3-18 months)

Microsoft is boldly venturing into uncharted territory with its latest feature intended for Windows 11: Quick Machine Recovery (QMR). This innovation promises to slash the time it currently takes to recover systems after a failure, offering solace to users and IT departments who’ve lived through the age-old adage; "try turning it off and on again." As mundane as it may sound, this development stands to become a game-changer.

The Problem: Painstakingly Slow Recovery

Anyone who's been in the midst of a critical task when their computer crashes understands the anxiety of waiting for a system recovery. The waiting time is not only frustrating but costly. Downtime can lead to productivity losses, missed deadlines, and, in severe cases, revenue impacts. Traditional recovery methods require patience and sometimes deep technical know-how to execute properly, especially within corporate environments. System recovery shouldn’t equate to watching paint dry with crossed fingers for successful rebooting.

Enter Quick Machine Recovery

Microsoft has dubbed this feature "Quick Machine Recovery," and as the name suggests, it promises to engage a much faster process for restoring computers to a working state after a malfunction. This capability will significantly minimize downtime, enhancing productivity by allowing businesses to bounce back from technical hiccups swiftly and efficiently. For IT administrators, this is a technological relief, transforming tedious system restoratives into a swift revival.

Features of Quick Machine Recovery include:

• Autonomous System Recovery: Automates the detection and initialization of recovery processes immediately after a failure.
• Streamlined Restoration: Leverages cloud support to expedite data recovery and system resets.

Impacts on Business

This feature can decrease latency in recovery time, offering both psychological comfort and tangible business benefits:

1. Operational Efficiency: Speedy recovery ensures minimal disruption, which is crucial for maintaining workflow continuity.
2. Cost Efficiency: Costs associated with downtime are significantly reduced when recovery is seamless and quick.
3. Increased Data Integrity: With cloud integration, the risk of data loss diminishes, ensuring organizational data remains intact and secure.

Practical Considerations

While the promise of a faster recovery is tantalizing, organizations should consider several aspects before rolling out this technology:

• Compatibility & Deployment: IT departments must verify that current systems are compatible. Deploying this feature might require system upgrades or network reconfigurations.
• Security Concerns: As with any innovation, one must remain vigilant regarding new security threats or vulnerabilities this feature might introduce.
• Training Needs: Employees, especially IT personnel, will need to become familiar with the new process to harness its full potential effectively.

Nitty-Gritty: The Technical Dive

While Microsoft has yet to disclose all technical specifications, initial reports indicate a reliance on enhanced cloud functionalities to improve speeds. According to quality assurance tests, systems with cloud-optimized settings see significant improvements, up to 50% faster recovery times compared to traditional methods.

Microsoft’s Vision: Recovery Reimagined

Microsoft's Quick Machine Recovery aligns with their strategic vision of streamlining user experiences to ensure seamless productivity. By reducing the fallbacks associated with system failures, Microsoft not only ameliorates user frustration but sets a new standard in system recovery protocols. It signals a harmonious blend of physical and cloud computing capabilities to facilitate an empowering computing environment.

RIP, Troubleshooting Fears

The fallout from system crashes has long been the bane of IT departments. This innovation marks a significant stride in alleviating recovery exasperations, bringing the prospect of seamless, self-restorative computing closer to reality. While the journey to flawless system uptime is ongoing, Microsoft’s QMR is an encouraging step forward.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. How does Quick Machine Recovery impact existing recovery protocols and downtime metrics?
2. Are there any potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited through the faster recovery process?
3. What additional resources or training might be necessary to implement and manage this feature effectively?

Action Plan

1. Evaluate Compatibility: Assess current systems for compatibility with Quick Machine Recovery.
2. Pilot Testing: Conduct trials in controlled environments to understand the feature's practical application and limitations.
3. Security Assessment: Perform a thorough analysis of potential security vulnerabilities introduced by faster recovery processes.
4. Staff Training: Develop a training module for IT staff on managing and troubleshooting Quick Machine Recovery processes.

Sources:

1. Bleeping Computer: Microsoft Testing Faster Quick Machine Recovery in Windows 11
2. ZDNet: Industry Insights on System Recovery Enhancements
3. Microsoft Official Documentation on Windows 11 Features

Avoiding the Collaboration App Slap

Who knew online teamwork tools could become the weakest link in your cybersecurity chain?

What You Need to Know

Collaboration applications such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack have come under increased scrutiny due to significant security vulnerabilities that have been identified. As a board or executive management group, it is imperative to understand the potential business risks and legal implications associated with using these tools without robust security measures. Immediate actions are recommended to ensure that proper safeguards are in place, which includes regular audits and employee training on safe usage practices.

CISO Focus: Application Security/Collaboration Tools
Sentiment: Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

The Dangerous Dance of Convenience and Security in Collaboration Apps

In the hectic push towards seamless online communication and teamwork, organizations have turned to collaboration applications like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack. However, recent scrutiny reveals that these platforms are often ridden with security vulnerabilities, potentially opening the doors to cybercriminals and espionage. The need for balance between functionality and security has never been more critical.

Deja Vu: Another Day, Another Breach

An all-too-common narrative is emerging around collaboration applications. As businesses favor their convenience, malicious actors exploit their weaknesses. In recent months, vulnerabilities have ranged from unauthorized access to network environments to leaked confidential files across these platforms, raising alarms in the cybersecurity community.

• Security Vulnerabilities: High-profile vulnerabilities have been identified in popular collaboration applications. Zoom has dealt with "Zoom bombing," Microsoft Teams faced file-access exploits, and Slack has had issues with unauthorized manipulation of workflows.

• User Impact: These vulnerabilities can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive company data, disrupted workflows, and, ultimately, a degradation of user trust.

The Cost of Weakness: Business Implications

For organizations, the implications of a data breach from collaboration apps are severe. They extend beyond immediate data loss and may include regulatory fines, reputational damage, and even legal action from clients and stakeholders.

• Regulatory Consequences: Many sectors are governed by strict data protection regulations. A breach could result in hefty fines, particularly under frameworks like GDPR.

• Reputational Damage: The loss of customer trust can lead to decreased business and a tarnished reputation that takes years to rebuild.

• Legal Ramifications: Organizations could face lawsuits if they are found to be negligent in protecting customer data.

The Immediate Need for Action

The reality of these vulnerabilities necessitates immediate action from all organizations relying on these tools. Implementing robust security practices is essential to protect sensitive data and continue business operations unhindered.

Recommended Steps:

• Regular Security Audits: Conduct frequent assessments of collaboration tool security settings and architecture.

• Employee Training: Provide regular cybersecurity training for employees to ensure they are well-versed in best practices and can recognize phishing attempts or suspicious behaviors.

• Enhanced Monitoring: Implement advanced monitoring solutions to detect unusual activity within collaboration environments swiftly.

• Vendor Collaboration: Work closely with collaboration tool vendors to understand security measures, request updates on vulnerability patches, and communicate any security concerns promptly.

Avoiding the "Collaboration App Slap"

While collaboration apps have become indispensable, a cavalier approach to their vulnerabilities can leave organizations with a costly 'slap' of security repercussions. The path forward lies in diligent cybersecurity practices, robust employee training, and a culture of continuous vigilance.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. What measures does the vendor have in place to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information through the app?

2. How often does the vendor conduct security audits and update their platform to address potential vulnerabilities?

3. Can the vendor demonstrate compliance with all relevant data protection regulations, and can they provide certifications or records of compliance audits?

Action Plan

For teams reporting to the CISO:

1. Identify the Platforms in Use: Catalog all the collaboration tools currently in use across the organization.

2. Conduct Immediate Security Audits: Engage with IT and cybersecurity teams to execute an audit of these platforms' current security settings.

3. Implement Security Enhancements: Based on audit findings, apply necessary updates and security patches, adjusting configurations to protect against known vulnerabilities.

4. Employee Awareness Campaign: Launch an internal awareness campaign on the risks associated with these apps and best security practices.

5. Establish a Response Protocol: Develop and disseminate a clear protocol for employees to report cybersecurity incidents related to collaboration tools quickly.

Source: News brief: Collaboration apps face security scrutiny -- again

The Great Firewall’s Slip: Knownsec’s Classified Leak

Even the spiders in the web can get tangled.

What You Need to Know

A significant data breach at Knownsec, a Chinese infosec firm linked to state-sponsored cyber activities, has exposed a vast trove of sensitive information, including details on cyber-weapons, internal tools, and a target list of international cyber-espionage operations. The leaked documents could alter the landscape of global cyber defense strategies. Executive management is expected to review current cybersecurity protocols and monitor international responses. Immediate containment and analysis of potential impact on corporate security is recommended.

CISO focus: National and international cyber threat intelligence
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

The Knownsec Breach: What You Need to Know

In an unsettling revelation, MXRN, a Chinese information security blog, reported a severe data breach at Knownsec, a Chinese infosec entity with connections to Beijing's military apparatus. The breach has unveiled over 12,000 classified documents, marking an unprecedented exposure of state-sponsored cyber-weapons and operational tools. For cybersecurity professionals globally, this incident underscores the multifaceted risks posed by such breaches, which go beyond traditional data theft.

A Potential Game-Changer in Cyber-Operations

The breach not only uncovered internal tools but also a detailed list of targets that Knownsec had successfully infiltrated. Most alarmingly, the stolen data includes:

• Remote Access Trojans: Capable of attacking diverse systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android.
• Android Exploits: Codes capable of extracting data from popular Chinese messaging platforms and Telegram.
• Compromised Overseas Targets: A spreadsheet highlighting 80 breached targets like government institutions and corporate entities across the globe.
• Vast Data Quantities: 95GB of Indian immigration data, 3TB from South Korea's LG U Plus' call records, and 459GB of Taiwan's road planning data.

With such depth and breadth of stolen data, nations and organizations affected are likely rushing to reassess and bolster their cyber defenses.

From State Secrets to Global Headlines

Knownsec's incident is not merely a breach, but a rare public reveal of cyber capabilities that were closely guarded secrets. Highlights from the exposed information suggest a systematic approach to global cyber espionage, targeting critical infrastructure and sensitive communications. Such revelations provide cybersecurity analysts with invaluable insights into Chinese cyber operation methodologies, potentially reshaping defensive postures worldwide.

The Geopolitical Ramifications

This incident elevates the ongoing digital arms race narrative. For nation-states, especially those identified on the target list, the breach represents both a security wake-up call and an opportunity to discover vulnerabilities within their own cyber-ecosystems. While this data breach adds fuel to international debates on cybersecurity policies, it complicates diplomatic arrangements, influencing international relations and trust.

In summary, even the covert operations of a cyber powerhouse like Knownsec are not immune to the vulnerabilities it seeks to exploit. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the perpetual threat environment composing today’s cyber battlefield, where even giants can fall prey to their own weapons.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. What measures are in place to protect against similar data breaches, particularly for sensitive or classified data handling?
2. How does your organization comply with international cybersecurity frameworks, and what certifications verify these practices?
3. What incident response protocols are activated when a data breach involves state-sponsored threat actors?

Action Plan

1. Urgent Review: Conduct an immediate assessment of all systems for any indicators of compromise or data theft, relating to Knownsec's leaked data.

2. Strengthen Defenses: Enhance firewall and endpoint protection, focusing on the vulnerabilities exposed.

3. Intelligence Collaboration: Engage with international cyber intelligence agencies to share insights and strategies on Knownsec's methodologies and tools.

4. Employee Training: Initiate robust cybersecurity training focused on recognizing sophisticated phishing and Trojan deployment tactics.

5. Engage Legal and PR Teams: Prepare to address potential fallout from the breach, considering legal implications and public communications.

Source: The Register

CISO Intelligence is lovingly curated from open source intelligence newsfeeds and is aimed at helping cybersecurity professionals be better, no matter what their stage in their career.

We're passionate advocates for good cybersecurity at home, at work, and in government.

Thank you so much for your support!

CISO Intelligence by Jonathan Care is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International