Dances in the Shadows, The Fault in Our Smart Machines, Ransomware That Multitasks, Retirement Revoked, Defense Under Attack, and Welcome Warnings. It's CISO Intelligence for Monday, 17th November 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Espionage with a Side of Code: The North Korean Cyber Ballet Unveiled
2. AI Bugs: The Not-so-Deep Secrets of Mega-Corp Frameworks
3. FBI's Top Ransomware: Akira - The New Maestro in the Cybercrime Symphony of Havoc
4. Click, Fix, and Oh-No: Finger Protocol in the Spotlight
5. Iranian Cyber Espionage: A SpearSpecter Story
6. Energizer Bunny No More: Google’s New Battery Warning for Android Apps

The North Korean Cyber Ballet: Espionage in Motion

Dance like nobody's watching; hack like the world isn't knocking.

What You Need to Know

Five individuals have admitted to enabling North Korean IT workers to penetrate 136 companies by facilitating payment processes and evading sanctions. This case exposes serious vulnerabilities within our cybersecurity measures, emphasizing the need for stringent vetting processes for IT contractors. We must address this issue urgently to safeguard our business interests from state-sponsored cyber threats. It's critical for our executive management to assess current IT security protocols, identify any suspect activities, and enhance ties with cyber intelligence agencies to pre-empt similar breaches.

CISO Focus: State-sponsored cybersecurity threats
Sentiment: Strong negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

In a landmark case underscoring the sophisticated malevolence of cyber espionage, five U.S. citizens have pleaded guilty to facilitating North Korean IT professionals to clandestinely infiltrate 136 companies worldwide. As digital borders become more porous, the intricate choreography of this high-stakes cyber ballet highlights both vulnerability and the relentless inventiveness of state-sponsored threat actors.

The Plot Revealed

This clandestine operation involved the orchestration of transactions to pay North Korean hackers masked as IT contractors. Their modus operandi exploited gaps in corporate due diligence, allowing them to circumvent sanctions designed to curb North Korea's governmental reach. This scheme thrived within multiple sectors, posing existential risks to the integrity of corporate servers and sensitive data.

• Guilty Plea and Revelations: Five accomplices admitted their roles in enabling financial transactions that supported this cyber infiltration. These individuals acted as mediators, aiding in the creation and operation of surreptitious bank accounts and facilitating deceptive invoicing processes.

• Scope of the Breach: Operating from a distance, North Korean IT operatives utilized their positions to access immense amounts of proprietary information across diverse industries. This systematic penetration of U.S. businesses not only jeopardized competitive intelligence but also hinted at potential long-term policy manipulation and sabotage efforts.

The Achilles Heel of Corporate Cybersecurity

The audacity of this cyber infiltration underscores chronic vulnerabilities inherent in many corporations' cybersecurity measures. The ramifications extend beyond financial losses, affecting corporate credibility and compliance with international laws.

• Due Diligence Failures: Lax vetting processes and inadequate oversight mechanisms provided a seamless entry for these operatives. It emphasizes the need for more rigorous identity verification and the use of advanced threat detection technologies.

• Sanctions Circumvention: The capacity for these hackers to bypass established sanctions demonstrates the need for enhanced collaborative efforts between nations and private entities, aiming for an agile response to evolving threats.

Call to Action: Strengthening the Fort

Corporations must prioritize cybersecurity resilience by adopting a holistic approach entailing personnel training, infrastructure enhancement, and international cooperation. Key strategies include:

• Enhancing IT Vetting Processes: Implement comprehensive background checks and identity verification protocols for all IT hires and contractors to mitigate infiltration risks.

• Investing in Cyber Intelligence Partnerships: Foster partnerships with government intelligence agencies and cybersecurity firms to gain insights into emerging threats.

• Continuous Monitoring and Threat Assessment: Deploy advanced AI-driven threat detection systems capable of identifying anomalous activities in real-time.

• Employee Education Programs: Conduct regular security training sessions to equip staff with the necessary knowledge to identify and report suspicious activities.

Time to Tighten the Cyber Leash

This case serves as a stark reminder of the relentless pursuit of sensitive data by state-sponsored hackers. Taking these lessons to heart, now is the time for businesses to re-evaluate and fortify their cybersecurity postures, ensuring that the walls of their digital fortresses are impenetrable.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. How do you verify the authenticity of contractors' identities, and what advanced methods are implemented for background checks?
2. What measures do you have in place to ensure ongoing monitoring of contractor activities and potential data access anomalies?
3. Can you provide a detailed incident response plan that includes collaboration with external cyber intelligence agencies?

Action Plan

• Identity Verification: Strengthen contractor vetting processes, integrating biometric checks and multi-source verifications.
• Security Monitoring Enhancements: Deploy advanced AI-based intrusion detection systems across all data access points.
• Cyber Intelligence Collaboration: Establish a dedicated liaison with cybersecurity intelligence agencies to ensure real-time information sharing and threat prevention strategies.
• Staff Training Programs: Initiate mandatory cybersecurity awareness programs focusing on identifying phishing and infiltration tactics.

Source: Five Plead Guilty in U.S. for Helping North Korean IT Workers Infiltrate 136 Companies - The Hacker News

AI Bugs: The Not-so-Deep Secrets of Mega-Corp Frameworks

When AI bugs give megacorps sleepless nights, even HAL 9000 would chuckle.

What You Need to Know

The recent exposé on significant bugs in AI frameworks developed by Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft poses an imminent threat to data security and operational integrity. Board members need to prioritize these findings at the upcoming meeting and mandate a comprehensive audit of any AI systems in use. Swift action is necessary to mitigate potential vulnerabilities that could result in data breaches or operational disruptions.

CISO Focus: AI Security and Vulnerability Management
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

When researchers uncover vulnerabilities within AI frameworks utilized by giants like Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft, the cybersecurity world takes notice. Let's unravel these bugs, as their potential impact demands your attention.

Major AI Bugs That Could Break the Internet

In recent findings reported by The Hacker News, critical vulnerabilities were discovered in the AI inference frameworks of leading technology companies—Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft (The Hacker News, 2025). These bugs pose severe security risks, potentially enabling malicious actors to hijack AI systems, steal sensitive data, and disrupt services across a multitude of sectors reliant on AI technology.

Why These Bugs Are a Big Deal

• Widespread Impact: These AI frameworks are embedded into a plethora of applications ranging from social media analytics and cloud services to autonomous systems and consumer electronics.
• Corporate Giants: When tech giants face such vulnerabilities, the cascading impact can disrupt global operations, affecting millions of businesses reliant on their AI solutions.
• Data Breaches and More: Exploiting these bugs can lead to unauthorized data access, service manipulation, and privacy breaches, intensifying the call for airtight security protocols.

The Technical Lowdown: How Do These Bugs Work?

According to security experts, these bugs reside in the inference process of AI systems, where input data is processed to generate results (Security Today). Vulnerabilities in this phase can lead to:

• Data Leakage: Sensitive data intended for machine learning can be intercepted or misdirected.
• Adversarial Manipulation: Attackers can subvert AI systems to produce incorrect outputs or crash systems entirely.

These issues highlight a fundamental flaw in the integrity checks and input validation processes of AI frameworks.

Mega-Corps Under the Microscope: Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft

• Meta: Renowned for its AI-driven social media platforms, Meta's systems could face identity theft risks and user data exploits if these bugs remain unpatched.
• Nvidia: Dominantly supplying AI hardware and software, Nvidia's exposure could impact industries leveraging its AI capabilities for data centers and autonomous vehicles.
• Microsoft: With its widespread AI services from cloud to enterprise solutions, any exploit could shake confidence in its Azure AI services and related products.

Immediate Response and Future Path

In response to these findings, Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft have initiated security patches and updates to address the vulnerabilities. However, the urgency to reinforce AI security protocols remains.

Engineering Solutions to AI's Buggy Intrusions

• Enhanced Security Audits: Regular and deeper penetration testing should be paramount to identify underlying weaknesses.
• AI Assurance Programs: Investment in AI safety and assurance programs to develop robust neural networks less susceptible to adversarial attacks.
• Collaboration and Transparency: A unified security initiative across companies will ensure collective defenses against emerging threats.

It's clear that while AI drives technological advancement, its security frameworks must evolve in parallel.

For Our CISO Readers

As CISOs grapple with these revelations, it's imperative to assess and fortify AI infrastructure immediately. These findings should serve as a catalyst to revisit and reinforce security strategies across AI ecosystems.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. What specific steps have been taken by [Vendor] to patch and secure identified vulnerabilities in their AI frameworks?
2. How does [Vendor] ensure ongoing monitoring and rapid response protocols for their AI systems to prevent potential exploits?
3. What collaborative measures is [Vendor] engaging in to enhance transparency and share threat intelligence with industry partners?

Action Plan

Immediate

• Conduct forensic analysis on any AI systems by Meta, Nvidia, or Microsoft deployed within the organization.
• Immediate application of all patches and updates recommended by said vendors.

Next Steps

• Initiate an AI vulnerability management program incorporating regular audits and AI safety protocols.
• Collaborate with external AI security firms to bolster internal capabilities and expertise.

Long-Term Strategy

• Promote AI safety and cybersecurity awareness among stakeholders to align technology advancements with secure practices.
• Regularly update incident response strategies to include AI-specific scenarios.

Source: Researchers Find Serious AI Bugs Exposing Meta, Nvidia, and Microsoft Inference Frameworks

FBI's Top Ransomware: Akira - The New Maestro in the Cybercrime Symphony of Havoc

Rolling out the red carpet for chaos, one encrypted byte at a time.

What You Need to Know

Federal agencies have raised the alarm on the Akira ransomware, highlighting it as a prime threat among the numerous variants prowling U.S. businesses. Executives need to ensure that immediate measures are implemented to address vulnerabilities, bolster defenses, and prepare for potential incidents. Engage with IT teams and verify that your organization's cybersecurity strategies align with the updated advisories from the FBI, CISA, and other international bodies.

CISO focus: Ransomware Preparedness and Response
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

In an alarming revelation, the Akira ransomware has been crowned as one of the FBI's top five most dangerous ransomware variants out of more than 130 targeting United States businesses. This joint revelation from the FBI, CISA, Europol, and other international agencies warns of Akira's evolving and aggressive tactics that include a double-extortion model, which encrypts victims' systems and siphons their data to maximize extortion leverage.

A Menacing Ensemble of Cyber Threats

• Rapid Evolution: Since first surfacing in March 2023, Akira has rapidly escalated its operations, amassing over $244 million through its unscrupulous activities. Its primary victims are small- and medium-sized businesses spanning various sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, and finance.

• Connections to Other Cyber Syndicates: The Akira group is suspected of affiliations with cyber actors like Storm-1567 and the disbanded Conti group, lending them formidable operational guidance and resources.

• Sophisticated Techniques: Akira exploits a slew of vulnerabilities, including weaknesses in Cisco firewalls, Windows systems, and VMware ESXi, among others. They adeptly adapt to operational security practices and deploy multi-layered attacks on their targets.

Vulnerabilities Exploited:

1. Cisco firewalls and VPNs
2. Windows systems
3. VMware ESXi
4. Veeam Backup and Replication
5. SonicWall firewalls

Proactive Measures and Defence Strategies:

• Vigilant Monitoring: It requires only two hours for Akira operatives to begin data exfiltration after accessing a network. They exploit remote access tools and create backdoors for persistent intrusion, underscoring the urgency for airtight security measures.

• Credential Management: Initial access is often gained through stolen credentials, brute-force techniques, and vulnerability exploitation. Strengthening password policies and continuously updating them is critical.

• Patch Management: The advisory highlights the urgent need for routine patching and updates on known exploitable vulnerabilities, specifically the notorious CVE-2024-40766.

• Recovery Preparedness: Implementing robust backup systems and ensuring that they cannot be easily corrupted or deleted by malicious actors.

Sounding the Alarm: Continuous Evolution

The advisory from federal law enforcement doesn't just sound a warning; it marks the evolving sophistication of ransomware operations, pointing out the profound need for proactive cybersecurity measures to thwart these threats.

In the digital age where bytes betray and data deserts with the swipe of a key, Akira emerges as a haunting melody of menace in the ransomware saga. Organizations must heed these warnings and shore up their defenses before they find themselves as encore victims in the cybercrime symphony.

Vendor Diligence

1. How can the vendor support implementing measures for patch management for known vulnerabilities like those exploited by Akira?
2. What tools and strategies does the vendor offer to enhance credential security against accounts' compromise?
3. Can the vendor provide advanced monitoring solutions to detect swift data exfiltration activities?

Action Plan

1. Immediate Vulnerability Scans: Conduct a thorough vulnerability scan across all systems to identify any gaps or flaws that Akira could exploit.

2. Credential Hardening: Implement multi-factor authentication and review existing password policies to mitigate credential theft risks.

3. Enhance Monitoring: Deploy advanced intrusion detection systems to monitor network traffic for suspicious activities, especially focusing on remote access tools like AnyDesk and LogMeIn.

4. Patch and Update Protocols: Expedite patching processes to quickly cover any exposed digital surfaces vulnerable to Akira's typical attack methods.

5. Incident Response Preparedness: Review and test incident response plans to ensure swift and effective reactive measures if a breach occurs.

Source: Cyberscoop

Click, Fix, and Oh-No: Finger Protocol in the Spotlight

Some dusty protocols never die; they merely get hacked.

What You Need to Know

The decades-old Finger protocol is being manipulated in recent ClickFix malware attacks. Executives need to focus on auditing legacy systems and implementing strict controls. Immediate cybersecurity enhancements are crucial to defending against potential breaches via outdated protocols like Finger.

CISO focus: Legacy System Security
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

In an unexpected twist reminiscent of a cyber version of "Back to the Future," the antiquated Finger protocol is at the heart of a contemporary cybersecurity threat. Recent reports have identified the rise of ClickFix malware, leveraging this long-awaited-to-be-retired protocol in a new campaign of digital threat.

What is the Finger Protocol?

Developed in the 1970s, the Finger protocol was created for querying user information on remote machines. While it hit its popularity peak back in the simpler days of early computing, it has largely fallen into disuse. However, like fashion trends, old protocols can re-emerge in ways least expected—and not necessarily welcomed.

The New Threat: ClickFix Malware

As disclosed by cybersecurity researchers, ClickFix malware exploits the Finger protocol by using it to facilitate lateral movement within networks. The malware infiltrates systems through vulnerabilities in legacy protocols, enabling threat actors to execute commands on targeted machines, steal sensitive data, and potentially take control of critical systems.

Potential Damage and Risk Factors

The ClickFix tactic presents several risks:

• Network Intrusion: Enables unauthorized access and movement.
• Data Exfiltration: High potential for stealing sensitive data.
• Remote Command Execution: Grants attackers the ability to execute unauthorized commands.

Why is Finger Protocol Still in Use?

While many organizations have moved away from using Finger, it remains embedded in some legacy systems still in operation today. Reasons include:

• Lack of Awareness: Many IT departments are uncertain of where Finger might still be active.
• Integration with Older Systems: Critical systems that have not been updated.
• Negligence: Absence of protocol audits in digital infrastructure maintenance.

Immediate Measures to Consider

Given the immediate threat posed by this malware campaign, organizations are urged to take the following steps:

1. Audit Protocol Use: Comprehensive check of all networked systems to identify if and where Finger is active.
2. Disable Unused Protocols: Swift disabling or removal of all unused legacy protocols.
3. Install Patches and Updates: Prioritize the installation of updates on systems still relying on older technologies.

Broader Implications for Cybersecurity

The exploitation of Finger Protocol in today's threat landscape serves as a warning about the vulnerability of antiquated systems. It underscores the need to:

• Understand Legacy Dependencies: Regularly review dependency on old protocols.
• Implement Advanced Security Measures: Use state-of-the-art security solutions against unconventional threats.
• Educate and Train IT Staff: Upgrade security literacy regarding potential vulnerabilities from legacy systems.

Finger-lickin' Challenges: Next Steps

This "blast from the past" acts as a stark reminder of the threats lurking in the least suspecting corners of cyber infrastructure. Though less common, these methods are no less sinister than cutting-edge cyber intrusion techniques.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. How do your systems manage old protocols such as Finger, and what are the protections against their exploitation?
2. Can you provide a historical security audit to demonstrate your capability in managing legacy protocols?
3. What measures are in place for rapid deployment of patches, specifically for legacy systems?

Action Plan

1. Review and Audit: Conduct an urgent audit of all systems to detect the presence of the Finger protocol.
2. Security Enhancement: Quickly implement security patches and configure firewalls to mitigate potential breaches through legacy software.
3. Education & Training: Instill a security-conscious culture among employees, with specific training on legacy system risks.
4. Vendor Collaboration: Engage with technology partners to explore options for modernizing or safely sunsetting systems reliant on obsolete technologies.

Source: Bleeping Computer

Iranian Cyber Espionage: A SpearSpecter Story

When it rains spears, wear an iron-tipped umbrella.

What You Need to Know

Iranian hacking groups, notably associated with the Iranian government, have been identified targeting defense and government sectors using a new cyber espionage campaign dubbed "SpearSpecter". This operation involves sophisticated spear-phishing techniques aimed at extracting sensitive information. Board members and executives should be aware of the increased threat landscape and ensure that sufficient cybersecurity measures are in place. Immediate attention to enhancing phishing defenses and reviewing incident response plans is recommended.

CISO focus: Cyber Espionage and Phishing Defense
Sentiment: Strong Negative
Time to Impact: Immediate

In a sophisticated and targeted cyber espionage operation, Iranian-backed hacking groups have launched an attack campaign known as "SpearSpecter" aimed predominantly at defense contractors and government entities. Leveraging advanced spear-phishing techniques, these hackers have escalated the stakes in digital warfare, prompting urgent reviews and fortification of security measures in potential target organizations.

Brewing Storm: The Launch of SpearSpecter

As cyber conflict becomes an extension of geopolitical tensions, the emergence of SpearSpecter represents a calculated move by Iranian hackers to pry into sensitive governmental and defense operations. According to The Hacker News, this campaign utilizes highly personalized phishing emails to deceive recipients into opening malicious attachments or visiting compromised websites. Such tactics allow attackers to gain initial access and deploy sophisticated malware payloads designed to extract confidential information.

• Target Profile: The primary targets are defense contractors and government agencies, especially those involved in areas of strategic national importance. The campaign’s specificity in targeting reflects careful reconnaissance and intelligence gathering.

• Technical Details: SpearSpecter employs social engineering techniques alongside zero-day vulnerabilities to penetrate defenses. The malicious payloads used in these operations are often customized to bypass conventional security mechanisms, making detection challenging.

The Consequences: Unpacking the Implications

The ramifications of SpearSpecter’s success could be significant, with risks extending to national security and economic stability. For organizations within the crosshairs, the implications span data breaches, potential intellectual property theft, and disruptive operations. Kevin Kelly, a cybersecurity analyst, highlights the persistent risks: “When state-backed entities engage in cyber espionage, the stakes transcend monetary losses—it’s about geopolitical influence and power.”

• Data Integrity Threats: Stolen data could be manipulated or used in disinformation campaigns, exacerbating the threat landscape.

• Strategic Impact: Compromised data from defense and government sectors could give adversarial nations a strategic advantage in global affairs.

Defending Against SpearSpecter: Bolster Your Cybersecurity Arsenal

Organizations must adopt a proactive stance to defend against SpearSpecter’s threat. Key measures include:

• Enhancing Phishing Defenses: Invest in advanced email filtering solutions that detect and block phishing attempts. Regularly update security awareness training for employees to recognize and report suspicious activity.

• Incident Response Upgrades: Strengthen incident response protocols. Conduct regular drills to ensure readiness in the event of a breach.

• Vulnerability Management: Regularly patch systems and update software to mitigate the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities.

What Lies Ahead?

As cybersecurity experts predict an increase in state-sponsored interventions in cyberspace, defenses must evolve in complexity and capability to counteract these sophisticated assaults. The case of SpearSpecter underscores the urgency for organizations to not only adapt swiftly but also anticipate future sneaky saber-rattles from the cyber domain’s dark corners.

In the tangled web of cyber espionage, vigilance and innovation are your best shields. As the cyber realm becomes ever more entwined with national security, the imperative is clear: outsmart the digital ghost lurking in the shadows before it strikes.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. What protocols are in place for detecting and responding to advanced spear-phishing attacks?
2. How does your solution integrate with existing infrastructure to enhance phishing defense mechanisms?
3. Can you provide case studies or references demonstrating effectiveness against state-sponsored cyber threats?

Action Plan

1. Review and Update Training: Initiate a comprehensive security awareness session specific to spearing tactics and ensure all staff recognize new phishing trends.

2. Upgrade Security Tools: Evaluate current antivirus and email filtering solutions, deciding on necessary upgrades or replacements to handle advanced threats like SpearSpecter.

3. Seek Intelligence Sharing: Engage with cybersecurity consortiums to stay updated on threat intelligence regarding state-sponsored groups and their changing tactics.

Source: Iranian Hackers Launch ‘SpearSpecter’ Spy Operation on Defense & Government Targets

Energizer Bunny No More: Google’s New Battery Warning for Android Apps

“Just because your app runs on juice doesn’t mean it should drain it faster than a college kid’s beer keg.”

What You Need to Know

Google is implementing a new feature in the Play Store that will flag Android apps with excessive battery consumption. This action aims to increase user awareness and incentivize developers to optimize their apps' energy usage. Board and executive management should take note of this development as it reflects broader trends in consumer expectations around app performance and eco-friendliness. Organizations with mobile app offerings should evaluate their software's energy consumption metrics to stay competitive and align with emerging standards.

CISO Focus: Mobile Application Security & Sustainability
Sentiment: Positive
Time to Impact: Short (3-18 months)

In a move that's sure to charge discussion among tech enthusiasts and developers alike, Google is setting its sights on battery-hogging Android applications. Soon, apps that guzzle your phone’s battery like it's the last drop of water in the desert will get a scarlet letter in the form of a warning on the Google Play Store.

Why It Matters

Consumers have long been aware of certain apps that drain batteries faster than others. However, until now, there was little they could do beyond uninstalling the apps or putting their phones into power-saving mode. Google's decision to highlight excessive battery use is a game-changer. It serves to increase transparency and put pressure on developers to refine their apps' energy efficiency.

Business Ramifications

• For Developers: This move is a double-edged sword. While it provides valuable feedback, it could also impact app ratings and downloads unless adjustments are made.
• For Competitors: The feature might create a level playing field, pushing lagging developers to step up their game or risk losing their customer base.
• For Consumers: It’s an empowering tool that offers them more control over their device's power management, aligning with environmentally conscious consumer trends.

The Technical “How”

The Play Store will employ a yet-to-be-specified algorithm to identify and flag apps with high battery consumption. Details around how this will be communicated—whether through static alerts or real-time notifications—are still under wraps. Such intricate algorithms usually consider a multitude of factors such as time-sensitive usage, background activity, and even hardware interactions.

Sentiment Analysis: A Positive Shift

The sentiment surrounding this announcement is predominantly positive. Users admire Google's proactive stance in driving energy-efficient software development, while developers have been granted a golden opportunity to innovate.

Time to Prepare

Although Google is cagey about an exact launch date, experts predict a roll-out within three to eighteen months. This window gives both new and existing apps time to implement changes and improve their battery profiles.

CISO Focus: Energizing Mobile Security

From a cybersecurity perspective, paying heed to energy efficiency contributes to app integrity. Excessive battery usage can sometimes be a symptom of poorly optimized code or, in worse cases, underlying malware activities. Ensuring an app is secure often goes hand-in-hand with optimizing its energy efficiency.

Vendor Diligence Questions

1. How does your development team plan to measure and optimize battery usage data for your applications?
2. What benchmarking tools are you employing to ensure compliance with Google’s upcoming guidelines?
3. How will you address potential consumer complaints concerning battery use before the feature goes live?

Action Plan for CISO Team

1. Audit All Mobile Applications: Conduct a comprehensive audit to identify applications with inefficient energy consumption.
2. Enhance Data Collection: Implement telemetry to gather user data on battery consumption in real-time.
3. Collaborate with Dev Teams: Work closely with development teams to prioritize battery optimizations in upcoming software sprints.
4. Prepare Communication Strategy: Develop a strategy to communicate any forthcoming updates or improvements to the user base, ensuring transparency and engagement.

To Plug or Not to Plug

Google’s impending update is a step towards harmonizing mobile applications with user expectations and environmental responsibility. It should compel developers to re-evaluate their energy usage metrics, potentially setting new standards in app efficiency, security, and performance.

Source: Google to flag Android apps with excessive battery use on the Play Store

CISO Intelligence is lovingly curated from open source intelligence newsfeeds and is aimed at helping cybersecurity professionals be better, no matter what their stage in their career.

We're passionate advocates for good cybersecurity at home, at work, and in government.

Thank you so much for your support!

CISO Intelligence by Jonathan Care is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International